<aside> ⚖️

Build a commentary channel with confidence. Know your rights, protect your content, and build alternative monetisation from day one - because even legally protected content gets demonetised.

</aside>

<aside> ⚠️

Important Disclaimer

This is educational information, not legal advice. Fair use is determined case-by-case. Even strong fair use cases often trigger Content ID claims - platforms and rights holders apply automated or risk-averse policies independent of what courts might decide.

</aside>


1. The 4 Fair Use Factors Scorecard

Rate your planned content against each factor before filming. Know your legal position before you publish.

<aside> 📝

Score Each Factor: Strong / Neutral / Weak

Factor 1 - Purpose & Character of Use

Transformative use: criticism, education, analysis, commentary. Your commentary dominates - original clips are evidence for your points. Simply reposting fails this test.

Factor 2 - Nature of the Copyrighted Work

Factual / documentary content gets less protection than fictional creative works. Using news footage or documentaries has stronger fair use standing - though fictional works are still usable with strong commentary.

Factor 3 - Amount Used

Less is more. Multiple very short clips are stronger than one long clip. Never use a pivotal or "heart" scene. Every second of footage must tie to a specific point.

Factor 4 - Market Impact

Your video must not replace the original viewing experience. Viewers should still want to watch the original after watching you. Commentary, critique, and education don't replace - they promote.

Overall risk level:

Weakest factor (needs work):

Go ahead / revise / abandon?

</aside>


2. Clip Strategy Checklist

Run every clip through this before including it.

<aside> 🎥

Before You Include Any Clip

<aside> ✅

Clip Presentation Best Practices

<aside> 💡

The "Evidence" Test

Before including any clip, ask: "What precise claim does this clip prove?" If you can't answer clearly in one sentence, omit it. Treat every clip like a footnote in an academic paper - it exists solely to support a specific point you've already stated in your own words.

</aside>


3. Script Structure Template

Claim first, clip as evidence, analysis second. Your voice must dominate.

Section Purpose Who Dominates? Your Notes / Script Beat
Intro (60-90s) State your thesis / analytical claim. No clips yet. You - 100%
Context (1-2 min) Background on subject. Build educational frame before any footage. You - 100%
Analysis Point 1 State specific claim → short clip as evidence → your analysis of clip You - 80%+
Analysis Point 2 State specific claim → short clip as evidence → your analysis of clip You - 80%+
Analysis Point 3 State specific claim → short clip as evidence → your analysis of clip You - 80%+
Comparison (optional) Side-by-side with another work to illustrate your point You - 70%+
Conclusion (60-90s) Synthesise your argument. No new clips. CTA. You - 100%

4. Content ID Response Planner

Even strong fair use cases trigger claims. Know your options before it happens.

Situation Recommended Action When to Dispute Documentation to Prepare
Content ID claim (monetisation removed) Assess: accept or dispute. Accepting doesn't admit wrongdoing. If you have strong fair use case across all 4 factors Script showing educational purpose, clip log, factor scorecard
Content ID claim (video blocked) File a dispute with detailed fair use explanation Almost always - blocking is more severe than demonetisation Same as above + timestamp log of every clip used
Manual takedown request Review carefully. Respond within deadline. If your fair use case is solid and video is important to channel Full documentation package + consult a lawyer if video is large
Strike Do NOT ignore. Dispute or wait for it to expire. Only if very confident - 3 strikes = channel termination All documentation + consider legal advice